A model does not fail uniformly. It has a region where its predictions are trustworthy and a region where they are not, and the honest object of study is that region itself. That object is not a single number but a filtration of applicable areas, ordered by how much error one is willing to tolerate.
Applicability as a filtration
Fix a model and a tolerance. The set of inputs on which the model is trusted at that tolerance is one applicable area
This nesting is a filtration of
Combining models by intersecting lax areas
An ensemble should be conservative, because each area is only laxly known, estimated and one-sided rather than exact. The applicable area of a combined model is modelled as the intersection of the members’ lax areas,
An input is inside the ensemble’s domain only where every member already stands behind it. This is deliberately pessimistic. Intersection shrinks coverage but raises the floor on trust, which is the correct trade when the cost of a confident-wrong prediction is high.
The split-free property
An applicable area is split-free when it cleanly separates an explainable pattern, meaning structure the model has captured, from genuine uncertainty arising from irreducible noise or true novelty. Where the split holds, low confidence can be attributed, distinguishing an unseen scaffold from a noisy assay rather than being lumped into one opaque score. Whether a given model admits a split-free area is not guaranteed, so it is a property to test for rather than to assume.
What this is meant to buy
The formulation is descriptive rather than a construction. It states what an applicable area is, namely a filtration; how areas compose, by lax intersection; and what good looks like, meaning split-free and honest under OOD and coverage. It does not say how to estimate