A cellular sheaf (in Justin Curry’s sense) attaches data to the cells of a space and glues it along incidences. Fix a base index category
assigning to each object
For a cover
The global sections are
Proposition. Descent is an equalizer
Gluing over a cover of
is the statement that
is an equalizer. On a finite poset with its Alexandrov topology every functor already satisfies the gluing axiom, so sheafhood on the nerve is automatic and carries no information; descent for a Grothendieck topology onis the substantive question. The nerve of a cover has the nonempty intersections as cells; functoriality makes pairwise agreement on overlaps propagate to all higher intersections, so only nerve edges carry a condition.
Definition. Local system
If every restriction
is invertible, is a local system. Transport is then an isomorphism, so no information is destroyed along a morphism, and the comparison map from a global object to its family of restrictions is injective. A separation failure, meaning distinct global objects with identical restrictions, can occur only when some restriction is non-invertible.
References
- Curry, “Sheaves, Cosheaves and Applications,” PhD thesis, University of Pennsylvania (2014)
- Shepard, “A Cellular Description of the Derived Category of a Stratified Space,” PhD thesis, Brown University (1985)
- Hansen & Ghrist, “Toward a Spectral Theory of Cellular Sheaves,” Journal of Applied and Computational Topology (2019)